SKC wrote:
QUOTE:
He said "The talks are a good early step to resolve unity problems among the Malays of different political views. If that can lead to unity and stability, I'm sure the Chinese and the Indian communities will surely welcome it, because stability will lead to the people's ability to improve their lives," He added "If the talks can be seen as an avenue to seek solutions, I don't see why they cannot continue. As a minister in charge of unity, I welcome (such talks),"
Wait, wait, wayhaaayt! Look at the sequence!
1. Resolve unity problems among the Malays.
2.
Will surely welcome it...
will surely
lead to blah blah blah...
So Malays still come first, eh?
What can 'our' stability do to help with their lives? Don't 'we' emphasize the fact that 'we' are different from 'them'?
Or are they pointing out that certain Malays have different education/thinking levels and they want to settle these things?
Might as well they quit the doodoo job, because there will be more and more of us finding out what they're really up to.
I'm not really Malay either, even if it's stated in documents that I am.
I get really annoyed when they play that card. I mean, where I am, it's like the world is here. Most students still stick to those who they find is similar to them, but apart from that, they're not hesitant to seek help from those who clearly aren't their kind.
We collegians are kids growing up in the real world. Haven't those politicians grown up yet, or did their outdated minds remain in days-long-gone?